The course of action:
The intention was to build a properly functioning rocket as quickly as possible which could compete with The Soviet Union’s Sputnik. They wanted to put a lot of money into the project in a short amount of time so that a good, competitive rocket could be built as quickly as possible.
22 unsuccessful training flights. The rocket just did not want to function properly.
They did not reflect on it fundamentally. There seemed to be a different defect 22 times. The same error did not appear more than once. Only when they performed an in-depth investigation of the entire set up of the program did they achieve a successful flight. Making repairs alone was therefore not sufficient.
The program leader was very clear when he said; “Failure analysis is basically research, when you get down to it. You recover and learn from mistakes; you don’t do that with success.”
S. J. Hogenbirk
OTHER BRILLIANT FAILURES
The course of action: To provide loan capital to cooperatives for purchasing and gathering crops. 1. Vredeseilanden distributed loan capital to be used at the cooperatives’ disposal. Initial loans, however, were not paid back. [...]
The course of action: To create and distribute an HIV/AIDS awareness quiz via SMS with Text to Change. Text to Change relied on all prior lessons learned in the area of ICT use in [...]
Why failure is an option..
Contact us for lectures and courses
Or call Paul Iske +31 6 54 62 61 60 / Bas Ruyssenaars +31 6 14 21 33 47